What Caused This Eruption?
Patient Presentation
A 33-year-old pregnant woman, gravida one, para zero, presented at 34 weeks of gestation complaining of a progressively worsening pruritic eruption. The lesions began around her umbilicus, and over a few days, extended to involve her whole abdomen with extension to her lower extremities. She was otherwise healthy with no personal or family history of any skin diseases. Her current list of medications included only iron supplements and prenatal vitamins.
On physical examination, multiple erythematous papules and plaques were noted on her abdomen and upper thighs. The lesions were slightly edematous and had a predilection for striae; no blisters were noted. She had no mucosal involvement and a review of her systems was unremarkable. Her complete blood count and liver function tests were within normal limits.
What is Your Diagnosis?
Diagnosis:
Pruritic Urticarial Papules and Plaques of Pregnancy (PUPPP)
Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy (PUPPP) is the most common of the pregnancy-specific dermatoses.1 It was initially reported as a “toxemic rash of pregnancy,”2 and the term PUPPP was introduced by Lawley and colleagues in 1979.2 In Great Britain the condition is known as polymorphic eruption of pregnancy.
Epidemiology
PUPPP is an inflammatory dermatosis associated solely with pregnancy, with an incidence ranging from 1 in 130 to 1 in 300 pregnancies.3 The majority (75% to 85%) of patients are primigravidas.4 The reason why it primarily develops in the first pregnancy is unclear.5 PUPPP typically occurs within the last 5 weeks of pregnancy, but lesions have been reported to develop as early as 17 weeks gestation,6 and rarely in the immediate post-partum period.7,8 A male:female ratio of 2:1 has been found in the offspring of affected women, but the relevance of this is not currently clear.9 No associations have been found with atopy,
pre-eclampsia or autoimmune phenomena,10 but 11% of patients are noted to have asthma.11
Pathogenesis
The cause of PUPPP is unknown. Several theories including abdominal distension, deposition of fetal DNA in the skin, an autoimmune hypothesis and a hormonal etiology have been implicated.5 The common clinical localization to abdominal striae suggests that abdominal distension may be an important factor. This theory is consistent with the findings of PUPPP being associated with an increased incidence of twins,12,13,14 multiple pregnancies9 and excess maternal weight gain.12 The immunohistologic profile may imply a delayed hypersensitivity reaction to an unknown antigen.
In a study by Aractingi et al, fetal DNA was found in skin lesions of PUPPP, and the authors suggested that fetal cells migrating to maternal skin may be an etiological factor.15 No definitive evidence has been found to implicate autoimmune mechanisms, and the frequency of human leukocyte antigens is normal.16 Zurn et al17 reported circulating IgM anti-basement membrane zone (BMZ) antibodies in five patients with PUPPP; however, the specificity of this observation has been debated.18 A recent prospective study of 44 patients with PUPPP also showed low serum cortisol levels compared with controls, suggesting a potential hormonal influence.9
Clinical Features
The clinical morphology of PUPPP is variable. Aronson et al have categorized the clinical features into three types.11 The typical lesions of PUPPP are pruritic, red, urticarial papules and plaques appearing on the trunk and proximal regions of the extremities. These lesions usually develop in abdominal striae and spread centrifugally, with sparing of the periumbilical region.19 Other commonly affected sites include the thighs, back, buttocks and the extensor surfaces of the arms.8 Sparing of the face is characteristic, even though facial involvement has been reported in a few cases.20 The palms and soles are also usually spared, and approximately 40% of patients develop vesicles.8
Laboratory Investigations
The diagnosis of PUPPP is often made clinically. There is no specific laboratory abnormality found in PUPPP. Investigations serve to exclude concurrent diseases.11,21 Skin biopsy findings are non-specific. In early PUPPP there is epidermal and upper dermal edema, accompanied by a superficial perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate.10 In approximately one-third of cases, eosinophils can be numerous, and occasionally eosinophilic spongiosis occurs.10 When small vesicles are present clinically, the histopathology usually reveals intense focal spongiosis, and occasionally subepidermal vesicles. In the resolving stage of the eruption, there are foci of parakeratosis and acanthosis.5
A biopsy for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) may be done when necessary to differentiate PUPPP from the urticarial form of gestational pemphigoid (herpes gestationis).22 DIF is negative in the great majority of cases.
Differential Diagnosis
The most important differential diagnosis to consider is urticarial gestational pemphigoid. Clinically, patients with gestational pemphigoid have systemic symptoms, involvement of the palms and soles, and periumbilical lesions are common. In addition, laboratory tests indicate leukocytosis with eosinophilia, and histology reveals subepidermal bullae.23 This is an immune-mediated condition, which characteristically shows linear deposits of C3 along the BMZ.
Pruritic folliculitis of pregnancy is distinguished on the basis of the follicular nature of the lesions and histopathologic features of folliculitis.24 Prurigo of pregnancy begins earlier in pregnancy, lacks urticarial lesions, persists throughout pregnancy, and may recur with subsequent pregnancies.24
Other conditions to consider in the differential diagnosis include drug eruptions, viral exanthems, scabies, urticaria, contact dermatitis and erythema multiforme.
Treatment
Because PUPPP is a self-limiting disorder without serious consequences for the mother or the fetus, a conservative approach is justified in most cases.5 Patients should be reassured that the eruption will resolve after delivery.24 General measures, such as cool soothing baths, frequent application of emollients, wet soak applied to the skin and light cotton clothing may provide symptomatic relief.5
Symptomatic treatment may involve using an antipruritic topical medication such as topical corticosteroids (for example, betamethasone valerate 0.1% applied twice daily).24 Most cases respond to this regimen within 24 to 72 hours with clearing of the rash and resolution of the pruritus.19 Systemic antihistamines such as hydroxyzine (Atarax) and diphenhydramine (Benadryl) may also provide some symptomatic relief.19 Of note, these drugs are both pregnancy category C.
In severe cases, a short course of prednisone in doses ranging from 40 mg to 60 mg daily usually induces a prompt resolution of symptoms and the eruptions.9,24 The use of oral corticosteroids in the latter part of the third trimester of pregnancy appears to have little adverse effect on the pregnancy. However, their use is rarely necessary, and should be limited to symptoms of intractable pruritus persisting in spite of intensive topical therapy.5 Early delivery in cases of intractable pruritus has been debated, but has not gained support.14,25,26
Prognosis
The mean duration of the eruptions is 6 weeks, but in general it is not severe for more than 1 week.10 Resolution typically occurs within 10 to 14 days of delivery.27 On resolution, there is no post-inflammatory pigment change or scarring of the skin.5 PUPPP does not appear to be associated with adverse perinatal outcomes,28 and to our knowledge, only one possible case of transient neonatal PUPPP involvement has been described.29 Recurrence in subsequent pregnancies, with menses or oral contraceptives, is uncommon.14
Our patient was treated successfully with topical corticosteroids, and her lesions resolved in 2 weeks.
Call For Cases
If you have a case you’d like to see published,
send a write-up (1,200 to 1,500 words) and an image of the patient’s condition to:
Dr. Amor Khachemoune,
Wellman Center for Photomedicine (BAR314)
Department of Dermatology,
Massachusetts General Hospital
Harvard Medical School
40 Blossom Street
Boston, MA 02114
Or, e-mail them to amorkh@pol.net.
References:
1. Lawley TJ, Hertz KC, Wade TR, Ackerman AB, Katz SI. Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy. JAMA. 1979 Apr 20;241(16):1696-9.
2. Bourne, G. Toxemic rash of pregnancy. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 1962;55:462-464.
3. Roger D, Vaillant L, Fignon A, Pierre F, Bacq Y, Brechot J-F, et al. Specific pruritic dermatoses of pregnancy: a prospective study of 3192 women. Arch Dermatol. 1994 Jun;130(6):734-9.
4. Shornick JK. Dermatoses of pregnancy. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 1998 Sep;17(3):172-81.
5. Ahmadi S. Powell FC. Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy: Current status. Australas J Dermatol. 2005 May;46(2):53-60.
6. Holmes RC, Black MM. The specific dermatoses
of pregnancy: a reappraisal with special emphasis on a proposed simplified clinical classification. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1982 Jan;7(1):65-73.
7. Buccolo LS, Viera AJ. Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy presenting in the postpartum period: a case report. J Reprod Med. 2005 Jan;50(1):61-3.
8. Black M. Polymorphic Eruption of pregnancy. Obstetric and Gynecologic Dermatology 2nd Ed 2001, Mosby. Page 39-44.
9. Vaughan-Jones SA, Hern SA, Nelson-Piercy C, et al.
A prospective study of 200 women with dermatoses of pregnancy correlating clinical findings with hormonal and immunopathological profiles. Br J Dermatol. 1999 Jul;141(1):71-81.
10. Holmes RC, Jurecka W, Black MM. A comparative histo-pathological study of polymorphic eruption of pregnancy and herpes gestationis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1983 Sep;8(5):523-9.
11. Aronson IK, Bond S, Fielder VC et al. Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy: clinical and immunopathologic observations in 57 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998 Dec;39(6):933-9. Erratum in: J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999 Apr;40(4):611.
12. Cohen LM, Capeless EL, Krusinski PA, Maloney ME. Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy and its relationship to maternal-fetal weight gain and twin pregnancy. Arch Dermatol. 1989 Nov;125(11):1534-6.
13. Bunker CB, Erskin K, Rustin MHA, et al. Severe polymorphic eruption of pregnancy occurring in twin pregnancies. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1990 May;15(3):228-31.
14. Kroumpouzos G, Cohen LM. Specific dermatoses
of pregnancy: an evidence-based systematic review.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr:188(4):1083-92.
15. Aractingi S, Berkane N, Bertheau P et al. Fetal DNA
in skin of polymorphic eruptions of pregnancy.
Lancet. 1998 Dec 12;352(9144):1898-901.
16. Yancey KB, Hall RP, Lawley TJ. Pruritic urticarial
papules and plaques of pregnancy. Am Acad Dermatol.
1984 Mar;10(3):473-80.
17. Zurn A, Celebi CR, Bernard P, Didierjean L, Saurat J-H.
A prospective immunofluorescence study of 111 cases of
pruritic dermatoses of pregnancy. Br J Dermatol. 1992 May; 126(5):474-8.
18. Helm TN, Valenzuela R. Continuous dermoepidermal junction IgM detected by direct immunofluorescence: a report of nine cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992 Feb;26(2 Pt 1):203-6.
19. De G, De G. Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy: an unusual case. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002 Jan:102(1):44-6.
20. Alcalay J, David M, Sandbank M. Facial involvement in pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986 Nov;15(5 Pt 1):1048.
21. Bolognia JL, Joseph LJ, Rapini RP eds., Dermatology. Mosby, 2003: 428-429.
22. Saurat JH. Immunofluorescence biopsy for pruritic
urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989 Apr;20(4):711.
23. Eudy SF, Baker GF. Dermatopathology for the obstetrician. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Dec;33(4):728-37.
24. Kroumpouzos G, Cohen LM. Dermatoses of pregnancy.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001 Jul;45(1):1-19; quiz 19-22.
25. Beltrani VP, Beltrani VS. Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy: a severe case requiring early delivery
for relief of symptoms. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992 Feb;26
(2 Pt 1):266-7.
26. Carruthers A. Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy [letter]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993 Jul;29(1):125.
27. Catanzarite V, Quirk JG Jr. Papular dermatoses of
pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Dec;33(4):754-8.
28. Errickson CV, Matus NR. Skin disorders of pregnancy.
Am Fam Physician. 1994 Feb 15;49(3):605-10.
29. Uhlin SR. Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of
pregnancy. Involvement in mother and infant. Arch Dermatol. 1981 Apr;117(4):238-9.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Skin and Aging News
- Tuesday, September 9, 2008 - 15:13
Anytown, California
top10
All time:
- Cracking Tough Cases of Contact Dermatitis
- CODING Update:Dressing Changes and Suture Removal
- The Dilemma Of Nail Pigmentation
- Topical Retinoid Therapy
- What Caused This Discoloration?
- New Products
- Injecting Botox: Tips from a Master
- Managing Hyperkeratotic Eczema of the Hands and Feet
- CME #126: Topical Uses of Vitamin C
- About Skin & Aging







